1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 971 F.2d
  5. 971 F.2d 1034 (1992)
 

BLASBAND v. RALES

No. 91-3633.

971 F.2d 1034 (1992)

Alfred BLASBAND v. Steven M. RALES; Mitchell P. Rales; John Doe 1-10; Danaher Corporation, Alfred Blasband, derivatively on behalf of Danaher Corporation, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided July 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen A. Whinston (argued), Arthur Stock, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., Mark Minuti, Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

Stephen P. Lamb (argued), Robert A. Glen, Robert E. Zimet, Joseph Guglielmelli, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Wilmington, Del., for appellees Stephen M. Rales and Mitchell P. Rales.

David C. McBride, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Del., for appellee Danaher Corp.

Before GREENBERG and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges, and DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge:

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Alfred Blasband appeals from a district court order of August 15, 1991, dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1 in this shareholder derivative suit. This appeal raises difficult issues regarding shareholder standing and demand futility in derivative actions brought under Delaware law. In view of the procedural posture of the case, we will accept...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases