1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 968 F.2d
  5. 968 F.2d 1003 (1992)
 

TEMEX ENERGY v. UNDERWOOD, WILSON, BERRY, ET AL.

No. 91-6069.

968 F.2d 1003 (1992)

TEMEX ENERGY, INC., Successor by Merger of Amarex, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNDERWOOD, WILSON, BERRY, STEIN & JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh D. Rice (H.D. Binns, Jr., Robert J. Campbell, Jr., with him, on the brief), Rainey, Ross, Rice & Binns, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff-appellee.

G. Blaine Schwabe III (Sarah A. Hall, with him, on the brief), Mock, Schwabe, Waldo, Elder, Reeves & Bryant, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellant.

Before HOLLOWAY and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and OWEN, District Judge.

OWEN, District Judge.

Before us again is the question of the appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) of an order of the District Court reversing a final order of the Bankruptcy Court and remanding for further proceedings.1

Appellant law firm Underwood, Wilson, Berry, Stein & Johnson performed certain legal services for a firm Amarex, Inc. in the year 1982. Underwood was paid $886,292 on account of these services by a legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases