1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 788 F.Supp.
  5. 788 F.Supp. 1178 (1992)
 

UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. NO. 500 v. U.S. GYPSUM CO.

Civ. A. No. 88-2012-V.

788 F.Supp. 1178 (1992)

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 500, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

March 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P. Stephen Martin, Bennett, Lytle, Wetzler, Winn & Martin, Prairie Village, Kan., James R. Goheen, McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, P.A., Kansas City, Kan., Kenneth B. McClain, Steven P. Callahan, Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, Independence, Mo., Bill E. Fabian, Laguna Vista, Tex., for Unified School Dist. No. 500, et al.

Dale L. Beckerman, Spencer J. Brown, Keith A. Cary, Penny G. Newman, Deacy & Deacy, Kansas City, Mo., Brett C. Coonrod, Deacy & Deacy, Prairie Village, Kan., for U.S. Gypsum Co.

Robert L. Driscoll, John C. Aisenbrey, Gregg F. Lombardi, Stinson, Mag & Fizzell, Kansas City, Mo., Elizabeth Goddard, Prairie Village, Kan., for W.R. Grace and Co.

Gordon E. Wells, Jr., W. Joseph Hatley, Lathrop & Norquist, Overland Park, Kan., Thomas J. Wheatley, Thomas A. Ryan, Lathrop & Norquist, Kansas City, Mo., for National Gypsum Co.

Leland H. Corley, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, Overland Park, Kan., Elizabeth M. Drill, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, Kansas City, Mo., for Celotex Corp.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motion (Doc. 278) of defendant W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn. (Grace) for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). Plaintiffs oppose (Doc. 291) the motion. The motion is denied.

This is a products liability action in which plaintiffs seek damages from defendants Grace, United Gypsum Company, National Gypsum Company, and The Celotex Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases