CONTI v. PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 91-3918.

977 F.2d 978 (1992)

James T. CONTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION and H. Michael McCurry, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Blessing (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Peter E. Tamborski, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cincinnati, Ohio, Guy O. Farmer, II (argued and briefed), Foley & Lardner, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Before: GUY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges; and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a diversity jurisdiction complaint, in which the plaintiff asserted long arm jurisdiction, because of lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants. Agreeing that the defendants had insufficient contacts with the plaintiff in Ohio to subject them to the court's jurisdiction in this case, we affirm.

The suit involves allegations of false representation by Defendants in connection with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases