NEWMAN v. STATE

No. 92-1680.

602 So.2d 1351 (1992)

Edward NEWMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, David C. Leahy, Supervisor of Elections for Dade County, and Leonard J. Cooperman, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lapidus & Frankel and Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahlbush and Saralyn Nemser, Asst. Attys. Gen., Janet Reno, State Atty., Robert A. Ginsberg, County Atty., and William X. Candela, Asst. County Atty., Richard M. DeMaria and Humberto Cancio, James Kohanek, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.


COPE, Judge.

Edward Newman appeals an order of the trial court which held that section 34.021, Florida Statutes (1991), is constitutional. We affirm.

I.

Appellant Edward Newman is one of three candidates who has filed qualification papers to stand for election for the position of County Judge for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Group 33. Appellee Leonard J. Cooperman is another candidate for the same position.

After the qualifying period ended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases