1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 981 F.2d
  5. 981 F.2d 965 (1992)
 

BOSTIC v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 91-2458.

981 F.2d 965 (1992)

Ray BOSTIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, James Pienta and William Marley, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 23, 1992.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied January 27, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Dale, Kenneth N. Flaxman (argued), Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellant.

Diane Larsen, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Lawrence Rosenthal, Deputy Corp. Counsel (argued), Frederick S. Rhine and Kelly R. Welsh, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Benna R. Solomon, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Appeals Div., Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, POSNER, Circuit Judge, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 27, 1993.

BAUER, Chief Judge.

Ray Bostic sued the City of Chicago ("the City") and two Chicago Police Department Detectives, James Pienta and William Marley, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and Bostic appealed. Because we find no violation of Bostic's constitutional rights, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases