DORITY v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

LUBA 91-209; CA A75863.

838 P.2d 1103 (1992)

115 Or. App. 449

A.D. DORITY, III, Petitioner, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 9, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Smith, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Michael E. Judd, Chief Asst. County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision that affirmed Clackamas County's denial of his application to build a nonfarm dwelling in an exclusive farm use zone. We affirm.

In his first assignment, petitioner contends that the county's finding that his property was not generally unsuitable for agricultural production, under the county analog of ORS 215.283(3)(d), was not supported by substantial evidence. We review to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases