1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 838 P.2d
  5. 838 P.2d 1099 (1992)
 

MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF TUCKER

79-7-412; CA A67897.

838 P.2d 1099 (1992)

115 Or. App. 436

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF William Harry TUCKER, Respondent, and Sharon Pamela Tucker, nka Sharon Pamela Chaussee, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Johnson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Raymond P. Young and Gevurtz, Menashe, Hergert, Larson & Kurshner, P.C., Portland.

Michael D. Walsh, West Linn, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hutchison, Hammond, Walsh, Herndon & Darling, P.C., West Linn.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Wife appeals a judgment of contempt for her violation of an order that was based on the property distribution contained in a dissolution decree1 entered on March 25, 1980.

As part of the property distribution, wife was awarded the Pine Cone Tavern, subject to a lien for $25,000 in favor of husband, which was to be paid should the property be sold. In 1983, wife leased the business

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases