1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 974 F.2d
  5. 974 F.2d 961 (1992)
 

U.S. v. WINT

Nos. 91-3831, 91-3832 and 91-3855.

974 F.2d 961 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael WINT, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charlie MURDOCK, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stanley Arthur BRYAN, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven A. Pihlaja, Minneapolis, Minn., argued for appellant Michael Wint.

Linda M. Ojala, Minneapolis, Minn., argued for appellant Charlie Murdock.

Michael J. Majewski, St. Paul, Minn., for appellant Stanley Arthur Bryan.

Carol A. Needles, Minneapolis, Minn., argued (Thomas B. Heffelfinger, Carol A. Needles and Nathan Radcliff, on brief), for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT and ROSS, Senior Circuit Judges.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Charlie Murdock and Michael Wint appeal from their convictions and sentences1 for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2, and threatening a witness with the intent to influence his testimony, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1512(b)(1). Stanley Bryan appeals from his convictions for conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases