SALKELD v. V.R. BUSINESS BROKERS, INC.

No. 2-91-0474.

596 N.E.2d 1325 (1992)

231 Ill. App.3d 441

173 Ill.Dec. 446

Melvin R. SALKELD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. V.R. BUSINESS BROKERS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.

July 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred Y. Kirkland, Jr., Marios N. Karayannis, Brady, McQueen, Martin, Collins & Jensen, Elgin, for Melvin R. Salkeld.

Hayes, Pesek & Webb, Oak Brook, Charles J. Pesek, Geneva, for V.R. Business Brokers Inc.

Robert L. Caplan, Clarendon Hills, for The Buffer Zone, Inc., Innovative Concepts and Joseph P.S. Licari.

Arthur R. Ehrlich, Goldman & Marcus, Gerald A. Goldman, Goldman & Marcus, Chicago, for Bantam Investment Group and Frank Contaldo.


Justice GEIGER delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a second appeal in a case where the plaintiff, Melvin R. Salkeld, Jr., has alleged common-law fraud and violations of the Franchise Disclosure Act of 1987 (the Franchise Act) (Ill.Rev.Stat.1991, ch. 121½, par. 1701 et seq.) and the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the Consumer Fraud Act) (Ill.Rev.Stat.1991, ch. 121½, par. 261 et seq.). The cause relates to the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases