KENAGY v. BENTON COUNTY

LUBA 91-097; CA A75580.

838 P.2d 1076 (1992)

115 Or. App. 131

Clif KENAGY and Lois Kenagy, Petitioners, v. BENTON COUNTY, Dennis Ranta and Judy Ranta, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied November 12, 1992.

Review Denied December 22, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Livingston, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Janet S. McCoy, Asst. Benton County Counsel, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent Benton County. With her on the brief was Candace A. Haines, Benton County Counsel, Corvallis.

No appearance for respondents Dennis Ranta and Judy Ranta.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Benton County approved respondent Ranta's1 application to construct a dwelling for his son and daughter-in-law on property in an EFU zone. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, which affirmed the county's decision and held that Ranta was a "farm operator" for purposes of ORS 215.283(1)(e) and the analogous provision of the county's development code (ordinance). Petitioners then sought our review. In Kenagy v. Benton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases