1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 127 N.J.
  5. 127 N.J. 64 (1992)
 

STATE v. BRANA

127 N.J. 64 (1992)

601 A.2d 1160

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO BRANA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Connell, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney).

Jack L. Weinberg, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Edward F. Borden, Jr., Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

In this case, as in State v. Dillihay, 127 N.J. 42, 601 A.2d 1149 (1992), also decided today, we consider whether a defendant's conviction for violating N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7, which prohibits distribution of controlled dangerous substances within a school zone, merges with a conviction for a first- or second-degree violation of N.J.S.A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases