1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 808 F.Supp.
  5. 808 F.Supp. 1097 (1992)
 

SCHICK v. ERNST & YOUNG

No. 90 Civ. 1005 (RWS).

808 F.Supp. 1097 (1992)

Peter G. SCHICK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beigel & Sandler, Ltd., New York City (Marilyn Neiman, of counsel), and Beigel & Sandler, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for plaintiffs.

Ernst & Young, New York City (Michael J. Eng, of counsel), pro se.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Ernst & Young ("E & Y") has moved to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to plead fraud with particularity under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6),1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and for failure to file the securities laws claims within the statute of limitations for actions under 15 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases