1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 956 F.2d
  5. 956 F.2d 944 (1992)
 

E.E.O.C. v. ACKERMAN, HOOD & McQUEEN, INC.

No. 91-6116.

956 F.2d 944 (1992)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACKERMAN, HOOD & McQUEEN, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

February 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Livingston, Acting Gen. Counsel, Gwendolyn Young Reams, Associate Gen. Counsel, Carolyn L. Wheeler, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Susan L.P. Starr, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Stephen P. Friot and Barbara L. Swimley of Spradling, Alpern, Friot & Gum, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellant.

Before LOGAN and BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and KELLY, District Judge.

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ackerman, Hood & McQueen (AHM) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on claims the EEOC brought on behalf of Phyllis Torbeck pursuant to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k). Following a two-day bench trial, the district court determined AHM violated the PDA, and thus Title VII, when it fired Phyllis Torbeck due to her pregnancy. EEOC v. Ackerman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases