1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 784 F.Supp.
  5. 784 F.Supp. 1112 (1992)
 

KIRBY v. WILDENSTEIN

No. 89 Civ. 1418 (LBS).

784 F.Supp. 1112 (1992)

Roger W. KIRBY, Plaintiff, v. Daniel WILDENSTEIN and Fondation Wildenstein, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beigel & Sandler, Ltd. (Lewis S. Sandler, of counsel), New York City, for plaintiff.

Shearman & Sterling (Jeremy G. Epstein, Karen M. Crupi, of counsel), New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff Roger Kirby has brought this diversity action against Daniel Wildenstein and the Fondation Wildenstein (together "Wildenstein") alleging the tort of product disparagement. Presently before us is Wildenstein's motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Wildenstein's motion is granted.

Background

A. Factual History.

Plaintiff is the owner of a painting entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases