HODGES v. AFSD

2-2101-AY9490-6; CA A68912.

826 P.2d 1056 (1992)

112 Or.App. 130

Mary HODGES, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur P. Klosterman, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Whitehead & Klosterman, Salem.

Diane S. Lefkow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) denying her request for a hearing to contest its lien on settlement proceeds that she had received. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Petitioner received public assistance from July, 1987, until October, 1989. She was injured in an automobile accident on July 27, 1988. AFSD paid her medical and other expenses. On October 19, 1989, she...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases