NIDA v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES

23-90; CA A65774.

826 P.2d 1045 (1992)

112 Or.App. 1

Neal M. NIDA and Cheryl A. Nida, Dba 60 Minute Tune, Petitioners, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES and William Melton, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Petshow and Bullock and Regier, Portland, for the petition.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and John Reuling, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, contra.

No appearance for respondent Melton.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


On Petitioners' Petition for Review of Order of Dismissal August 21, 1991.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Employers seek Supreme Court review of our order dismissing their petition for judicial review. We allow reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and vacate the order of dismissal.

The issue is whether, under the Administrative Procedures Act, ORS chapter 183, if a petition for review is filed and the agency then withdraws its order and issues an order on reconsideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases