PER CURIAM.
Defendant was indicted for delivery of marijuana for consideration on March 13 and March 19, 1990 (Counts I and III), and for delivery of marijuana for consideration on March 13 and March 19, 1990, as part of a scheme or network (Counts II and IV). He demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was overruled. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was found guilty of all four charges. The trial court merged Count I with Count II and Count III...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.