STATE v. LOTT

C90-04-32163; CA A67071.

823 P.2d 1041 (1992)

111 Or.App. 394

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Charles Henry LOTT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Steven V. Humber, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief, for appellant.

No appearance, for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


Submitted on Record and Appellant's Brief, December 19, 1991.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of possession and delivery of controlled substances as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the scheme or network language is unconstitutionally vague. However, on appeal, he challenges only the sentence imposed. The state concedes, by letter, that the sentence is improper. State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases