1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 828 P.2d
  5. 828 P.2d 1032 (1992)
 

BLUMENAUER v. KEISLING

SC S38912.

828 P.2d 1032 (1992)

313 Or. 10

Earl BLUMENAUER, Petitioner, v. Phil KEISLING, Secretary of State, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided March 26, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied April 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Tanzer, of Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition was Richard H. Allan, Portland.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PETERSON, Justice.

Petitioner is an elector who is dissatisfied with a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure. ORS 250.085.1

Because our decision turns in part on procedural requirements of the initiative statutes, we first summarize the pertinent statutory provisions. ORS 250.045(1) permits a petitioner to file with the Secretary of State a "prospective [initiative] petition." The Secretary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases