This appeal calls upon us to determine whether responses to a question regarding current treatment for disabilities, on an application for a New York driver's license, are subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6 [FOIL]). We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that such information is exempt from disclosure as "medical * * * histories" (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HANIG v. NYS MOTOR VEHICLES
79 N.Y.2d 106 (1992)
In the Matter of Joel D. Hanig, Appellant, v. State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 7, 1992.
Decided February 18, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.