1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 823 P.2d
  5. 823 P.2d 1033 (1992)
 

GUTHRIE v. SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIV.

CA A66609.

823 P.2d 1033 (1992)

110 Or.App. 622

William C. GUTHRIE, On Behalf of Himself and On Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Petitioner, v. SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Department of Justice, State of Oregon, a State Agency; Colleen Sealock, Individually and in Her Capacity As Administrator, Support Enforcement Division, Department of Justice, State of Oregon, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 15, 1992.

Reconsideration Allowed April 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Schuster, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Roger F. Dierking, Portland.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this ORS 183.400 challenge to OAR 137-50-320 to OAR 137-50-490, as amended,1 popularly known as "Child Support Guidelines," petitioner urges a panoply of supposed defects. However, only one of his arguments requires discussion.

Under ORS 107.105(1)(c), a trial court may order either or both joint custodial parents to pay child support.2 OAR 137-50-450(10) requires the court to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases