TEENY v. HAERTL CONSTRUCTORS, INC.

A8808-04655; CA A63888.

826 P.2d 1029 (1992)

111 Or.App. 543

Gary W. TEENY and Richard L. Teeny, Dba Teeny's Steel and Crane Erection, Plaintiffs, v. HAERTL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., an Oregon Corporation, and Manhattan-Rose City Glass, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Respondents, Camera World Company, an Oregon Corporation; Chung Doo Shin, an Individual, Respondents, Marshall Company Construction, an Assumed Business Name of John H. Marshall, Appellant, Microflect, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Dba Grating Specialties Division, Appellant-Respondent, Enterprise Fabricators Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, and Alfred E. Aus and Esther W. Aus, Husband and Wife; U.S. National Bank of Oregon, a National Banking Association; Drs. Good and Cherrier, P.C., a Professional Corporation; Knez Building Materials Company, an Oregon Corporation; Don Earl, Michael Gardner and Michael Satran, Dba Western States Sheet Metal, Inc.; Cab, Inc., Dba Union Floor Company; Parr Lumber Company, an Oregon Corporation; Michael Gardner, Dba Sun Roofing; Bachofner Electric, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Landry's Commercial Floor Coverings, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Dan E. Ward, Dba Willamette Painting Co.; Overhead Door Company of Portland-Vancouver, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Dba Overhead Door Company of Portland, Inc.; Asi Heating and Air Conditioning, Incorporated, an Oregon Corporation; Modern Plumbing Company, an Oregon Corporation; Landco Enterprises, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; and James B. Johnston, Dba Wood Hollow Cabinets, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex E.H. Armstrong, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Marshall Co. Const. With him on the briefs was Bogle & Gates, Portland.

K. John Condon, Portland, filed the brief for appellant-respondent Microflect, Inc.

William Day, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant-respondent Enterprise Fabricators Co., Inc.

Suzanne C. Pickgrobe, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Camera World Co. and Chung Doo Shin. With her on the brief was Kell, Alterman & Runstein.

No appearance for respondent Manhattan-Rose City Glass, Inc.

No appearance for respondent Haertl Constructors, Inc.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


RIGGS, Judge.

This action was brought by subcontractors who worked on a major building renovation project in downtown Portland.1 They sought recovery against Haertl Constructors, Inc. (Haertl), the general contractor, for amounts due on the subcontracts and sought to foreclose construction liens against Chung Doo Shin, the owner of the property, and Camera World Company (Camera World), the lessee. Three of the subcontractors, Enterprise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases