URBAN v. C.I.R.

No. 91-70526.

964 F.2d 888 (1992)

Ruth E. URBAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth E. Urban, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal., pro se.

Shirley D. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R. Allen, David English Carmack, Christine A. Grant, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Before: HUG, THOMPSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Ruth E. Urban appeals pro se the tax court's order granting the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's ("CIR") motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a) and affirm the tax court's decision.1

I

Standard of Review

Whether the tax court's judgment on the pleadings was proper is a question of law which we review de novo. See Grimes v. Commissioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases