MAHONEY v. BURGER KING CORPORATION

No. 91-776.

600 So.2d 1252 (1992)

Maria Dolores MAHONEY, Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied August 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Perse & Ginsberg and Rene E. Lamar and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel and Byron G. Petersen and Steven S. Goodman, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Summary judgment was appropriate in this slip-and-fall case where the plaintiff failed to present evidence that the store owner had actual or constructive notice of the substance, or that the substance was on the floor as a result of the actions of store employees or agents, or that while the owner did not actually create the specific condition which caused the fall, the method of operation was so inherently dangerous that the store owner may still be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases