SM MOTOR CO. v. MATHER

90-21041; CA A72515.

843 P.2d 998 (1992)

117 Or. App. 176

In the Matter of the Compensation of Howard R. Mather, Claimant. SM MOTOR CO., Petitioner, v. Howard R. MATHER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darren L. Otto, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Scheminske & Lyons.

Max Rae, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming and adopting the referee's order holding claimant's aggravation claim compensable. We affirm the Board and write only to address the question of the timeliness of the claim.

The referee's findings are not challenged: Claimant suffered a compensable neck and upper back injury in 1984 while working as a mechanic. The referee found that the injury had "resulted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases