STATE v. DARROCH

10-90-07719B; CA A69371.

843 P.2d 978 (1992)

117 Or. App. 185

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Scott Marlow DARROCH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 16, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied February 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael V. Phillips, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Johnson, Clifton, Larson & Bolin, P.C., Eugene.

Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals convictions for manufacture, delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1)(a), (4)(a). He contends that the court erred by denying his motions to controvert a search warrant affidavit and to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. We affirm.

Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at defendant's residence and seized marijuana plants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases