The INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried Machine and Furniture Workers, the Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO, and the United Steelworkers of America, Plaintiffs,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Orion Electric Co., Ltd., Goldstar Co., Ltd., Goldstar of America, Inc., Goldstar Electronics International, Inc., Goldstar Mexico, S.A. De C.V., Samsung Electron Devices Co., Ltd., Samsung Mexicana, S.A., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc., Mitsubishi Electronics Industries Canada Inc., Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd. and Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation, Intervenors-Defendants.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 14, 1992.
August 14, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Paul D. Cullen, Laurence J. Lasoff and Stephen A. Jones, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.
Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Vanessa P. Sciarra, and Office of Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Robert J. Heilferty, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for defendant.
Reid & Priest, David A. Gantz and Elizabeth H. Lefebrve, for intervenor-defendant Orion Electric Co., Ltd.
Donovan Leisure, Rogovin, Huge & Schiller, Michael P. House and R. Will Planert, for intervenors-defendants Goldstar Co., Ltd., Goldstar of America, Inc., Goldstar Electronics Intern., Inc. and Goldstar Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., Sukhan Kim, Warren E. Connelly and Robert W. Aulsebrook, for intervenors-defendants Samsung Electron Devices, Co., Ltd., Samsung Mexicana, S.A. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Leonard M. Shambon and Rebecca Arbogast, for intervenors-defendants Sony Corp. and Sony Corp. of America.
Baker & McKenzie, Thomas P. Ondeck and Kevin O'Brien, for intervenors-defendants Mitsubishi Elec. Corp., Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. and Mitsubishi Electronics Industries Canada Inc.
Willkie Farr & Gallagher, William H. Barringer, James P. Durling and Daniel L. Porter, for intervenor-defendant Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. Ltd.
McDermott, Will & Emery, Carl W. Schwarz and David J. Levine, for intervenor-defendant Hitachi, Ltd.
Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., Gail T. Cumins and Ned H. Marshak, for intervenor-defendant Sanyo Mfg. Corp.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
AQUILINO, Judge:
In this action the plaintiffs have interposed a motion for judgment on the record compiled by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA") sub nom. Color Picture Tubes from Canada, Japan, Republic of Korea & Singapore; Negative Final Determinations of Circumvention of Antidumping Duty Orders, 56 Fed.Reg. 9,667 (March 7, 1991). They characterize the action as "the first ... that attempts to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
