SCOTT v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A69703 (Control), CA A70495.

843 P.2d 959 (1992)

117 Or. App. 170

Sidney SCOTT, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 9, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied February 10, 1993.

Review Denied March 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the case for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Yuanxing Chen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of two orders of the Board of Parole.1 We conclude that we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the petitions.

Petitioner assigns error to the Board's decision in 1991 that he maintains set his parole consideration hearing date for June 16, 2009. However, his parole consideration hearing date was changed to June 16, 2009, by a March, 1989, order of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases