1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 835 P.2d
  5. 835 P.2d 959 (1992)
 

STATE v. HOFFER

89C-21119; CA A67328.

835 P.2d 959 (1992)

114 Or. App. 508

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Robert Mark HOFFER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Stoller, Dundee, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet E. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, J.

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance and keeping and maintaining a place where a controlled substance is kept. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.992(4); ORS 475.993(1)(e). He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motions to controvert and to suppress. We affirm.

State Trooper Welty submitted an affidavit in support of an application for a warrant to search defendant's house. Pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases