1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 80 Ohio
  5. 80 Ohio App.3d 97 (1992)
 

UEBELACKER v. CINCOM SYSTEMS, INC.

Nos. C-910258, C-910364.

80 Ohio App.3d 97 (1992)

UEBELACKER, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. CINCOM SYSTEMS, INC. et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided September 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tobias & Kraus and David Torchia, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Dinsmore & Shohl, Jerry S. Sallee and Gregory A. Harrison, for appellee and cross-appellant Cincom Systems, Inc.

White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A., and Ronald A. Meyer, for appellee and cross-appellant Frank H. Veith, Jr.

HILDEBRANDT, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee, Carl O. Uebelacker ("Uebelacker"), appeals from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in which the motion for a new trial or remittitur of the defendants-appellees Cincom Systems, Inc. ("Cincom") and Frank H. Veith, Jr. ("Veith"), collectively "appellees," was granted. We have assigned this court's case No. C-910258 to this appeal. The appellees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases