McINTOSH v. HOUGH

Nos. 78152, 78169 and 78206.

601 So.2d 1170 (1992)

Ronald Guy McINTOSH, Petitioner, v. L.H. HOUGH, et al., Respondents. LES MILES ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. L.H. HOUGH, et al., Respondents. Gregory W. JOHNSON, et al., Petitioners, v. L.H. HOUGH, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied August 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Gregg McCaulie, Mahon, Farley & McCaulie, P.A., Jacksonville, Tyrie A. Boyer, Boyer, Tanzler & Boyer, P.A., Jacksonville, and Lavinia K. Kierking, Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabniss, Burke & Wechsler, P.A., Orlando, for petitioners.

Carl D. Dawson, Dawson, Galant, Sulik, Wiesenfeld & Bickner, Jacksonville, for respondents.


GRIMES, Justice.

Pursuant to our jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution, we review McIntosh v. Hough, 579 So.2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the following to be a question of great public importance:

WHEN A PURCHASER FOR VALUE AFTER LIS PENDENS BUT WITHOUT ACTUAL NOTICE PURCHASES PROPERTY FROM THE FRAUDULENT GRANTEE AND THEN IS DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases