BAHRS v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.

No. CIV 92-097.

795 F.Supp. 965 (1992)

Frances F. BAHRS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Third Party Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

Amended Order July 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Stompoly, Mary Judge Ryan, Stompoly & Stroud P.C., Tucson, Ariz., Arnold Levin, Levin Fishbein Sedran & Berman, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Michael J. Meehan, Molloy Jones & Donahue PC, Tucson, Ariz., Bruce A. Featherstone, Kirkland & Ellis, Denver, Colo., for defendants.

David Charles Anson, DeConcini McDonald Brammer, Yetwin & Lacy P.C., Tucson, Ariz., Herbert L. Fenster, McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, D.C., Halfred Martin Hofherr, Lyle O. Reinsch, General Dynamics Corp., Convair Div., San Diego, Cal., for General Dynamics Corp., defendant/third-party plaintiff.

David Alwin Paige, Snell & Wilmer, Tucson, Ariz., James F. Murphy, John W. Adler, Adler Kaplan & Begy, Chicago, Ill., for Tucson Airport Authority, defendant.

Edward G. Hochuli, Kevin David Neal, Jones Skelton & Hochuli, Phoenix, Ariz., for McDonnell Douglas Corp., defendant.

Stephen M. Weiss, Karp Stolkin & Weiss, PC, Tucson, Ariz., for Robert E. Morrison, defendant.

Don B. Overall, U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., JoAnn J. Bordeaux, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.


ORDER

ROLL, District Judge.

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Pending before the Court is defendant General Dynamics' motion to reconsider and/or certification.

OPINION AND ORDER

I. Motion for reconsideration.

Defendant General Dynamics moves the Court to reconsider its decision granting plaintiffs' motion to remand. A motion to reconsider must provide a valid ground for reconsideration by showing two things. First...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases