GILBERT v. TEKTRONIX, INC.

89-0323CV; CA A65073.

827 P.2d 919 (1992)

112 Or.App. 34

William GILBERT, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. TEKTRONIX, INC., Respondent — Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 11, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied May 13, 1992.

Review Denied May 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Randolph Pickett, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant — cross-respondent.

Jacklyn M. Bartruff, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With her on the briefs were Christine Kitchel, Mary K. VanderWeele and Stoel, Rives, Boley, Jones & Grey, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

After being terminated from his position, plaintiff brought this action against defendant employer for breach of an employment contract and age discrimination. The trial court dismissed the age discrimination claim, and he does not assign error to that decision. At the close of the evidence, the trial court denied defendant's motion for a directed verdict on the breach of contract claim. The jury returned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases