HUERTA v. HUERTA

No. 19088.

833 P.2d 911 (1992)

122 Idaho 278

Eleanor Faye HUERTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 1992 Term.

June 8, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webb, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant. Lloyd J. Webb argued.

Dial, Looze & May, Pocatello, for plaintiff-respondent. Brent E. Asay argued.


REINHARDT, Justice Pro Tem.

This appeal arises from a divorce action in which the parties disputed the proper characterization, valuation and division of property. In addition to asserting error with regard to the characterization and division of property, the appellant contends the trial court erred by failing to make sufficient findings relating to valuation of property.

In divorce actions, it is well established that a trial court is required to make findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases