1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 823 S.W.2d
  5. 823 S.W.2d 910 (1992)
 

EKELMAN v. LOCKHART

No. 91-343.

823 S.W.2d 910 (1992)

308 Ark. 371

William F. EKELMAN, Petitioner, v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Ekelman, pro se.

Winston Bryant, Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

William F. Ekelman asks permission to file a handwritten brief. We have held that a handwritten brief will be allowed on two conditions— one, that the movant has no access to a typewriter and, two, makes a showing that there is substantial merit to the action. Patterson v. Smith, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). Since the adoption of that rule some years ago we have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases