MARSH v. CRUCIBLE INC. 1975 SALARIED RET. PLAN

Civ. A. No. 90-727.

783 F.Supp. 938 (1992)

Edwin L. MARSH, Howard W. Bigleman, Anthony J. DeCosta, John R. Kundick, Theodore T. Lehmann, Robert A. Lippert, Frank S. Matsukas, Lawrence V. Nagle, William H. Stephens, Plaintiffs, v. CRUCIBLE INC. 1975 SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

January 17, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Ahearn, Ligonier, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Paula Ganz, William H. Powderly, III, Jones Day Reavis & Pogue, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

MENCER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking to compel the payment of certain claimed retirement benefits from the defendant Plan. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side arguing that there are no material disputes of fact and claiming entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases