1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio App.3d 96 (1992)
 

GRAY v. AUSTIN

No. 12636.

75 Ohio App.3d 96 (1992)

GRAY, Appellant, v. AUSTIN et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided January 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Dietz, for appellant.

Richard Austin, pro se.

Nwabueze V. Okocha, for appellees Alvarene N. Owens, Taylor Jones, Jr., and Austin, Jones, Littlejohn & Owens Co., L.P.A.

Bill C. Littlejohn, pro se.

GRADY, Judge.

Plaintiff, Arthur Gray, filed a complaint against defendant Richard Austin and others, alleging legal malpractice. The trial court found that Gray's cause of action was barred by the relevant statute of limitations, R.C. 2305.11(A), and dismissed the complaint by summary judgment. Gray appeals.

Gray's complaint alleged legal malpractice in attorney Austin's representation of him as a plaintiff in a civil action before the United States District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases