1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 838 S.W.2d
  5. 838 S.W.2d 874 (1992)
 

MERRILL LYNCH v. EDDINGS

Nos. 10-92-047-CV, 10-92-054-CV.

838 S.W.2d 874 (1992)

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, Appellant, v. Kirston and Amanda EDDINGS, Appellees. Randy L. RAMEY, Appellant, v. James R. EDDINGS, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Rehearing Denied October 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Coyt Randal Johnston and Robert L. Tobey, Johnston & Budner, P.C., Dallas, for appellant Randy L. Ramey.

Gregory D. May and Mary Beth Marshall, Decker, Hardt, Kopf, Harr, Munsch & Dinan, P.C., Dallas, for appellant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith.

Van E. McFarland & James D. Pierce, Van McFarland & Associates, Houston, for appellees Kirston and Amanda Eddings, James R. Eddings, et al.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and CUMMINGS and VANCE, JJ.

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

Merrill Lynch and Randy Ramey, an employee of Merrill Lynch, appeal under article 238-2, § A(l) and Rule 42 from the court's orders denying their motions to compel arbitration. See Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 238-2, § A(l) (Vernon 1973); Tex. R.App.P. 42. Because we find that the court should have ordered the parties to submit their disputes to arbitration, we will reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases