CATO v. CATO

(10156)

27 Conn. App. 142 (1992)

JUDITH A. CATO v. HERBERT J. CATO, JR.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 24, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Meanix, Jr., for the appellant (defendant).

John K. Currie, with whom, on the brief, was Courtney B. Bourns, for the appellee (plaintiff).

NORCOTT, FOTI and GEEN, JS.


FOTI, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. He claims that the trial court improperly determined that the process and service of process were sufficient, and that the court had personal jurisdiction over him. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following undisputed facts are relevant to this appeal. The parties were married in Amsterdam, New York, on November 12, 1965. In 1970, they purchased a home in Bloomfield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases