1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 819 F.Supp.
  5. 819 F.Supp. 871 (1992)
 

TOMAR ELECTRONICS v. WHELEN TECHNOLOGIES

No. Civ. 92-0882-PHX CAM.

819 F.Supp. 871 (1992)

TOMAR ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WHELEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ASH, Inc., d/b/a Auto Safety House, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

October 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Cates, Cates & Holloway, Scottsdale, AZ, Roger A. Van Kirk, Guy D. Yale, Hartford, CT, for defendant Whelen Technologies, Inc.

Thomas G. Hayman, Hayman & Johnson, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant Kirk Amster.

Thomas G. Watkins III, Cahill, Sutton & Thomas, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff Tomar Electronics, Inc.

ORDER

MUECKE, District Judge.

Having considered the pleadings filed by the parties concerning defendants' motions to dismiss, stay or transfer, strike plaintiff's motion, and for protective order, and for plaintiff's motion to reset discovery schedule, the Court has determined that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument1, and concludes as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases