DUPRE v. PENROD DRILLING CORP.

No. 90-2729.

788 F.Supp. 901 (1992)

Hubert DUPRE v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

March 23, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey Jay Lewis, Richard James Serpe, Lewis & Kullman, New Orleans, La., for Hubert J. Dupre, Jr.

William Byron Schwartz, William Daniel Wellons, Burke & Mayer, New Orleans, La., for Penrod Drilling Co. and Penrod Drilling Corp.

Christopher J. Kosciuk, Law Office of James J. Morse, New Orleans, La., for Travelers Ins. Co.

Hal James Broussard, Susan A. Daigle, Paul B. David, Broussard, David & Daigle, Lafayette, La., for Total Minatome Corp.


ORDER AND REASONS

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

Third-party defendant, Total Minatome Corporation ("TMC"), filed a motion for summary judgment seeking contractual indemnity from defendant, Penrod Drilling Corporation ("Penrod"). Penrod filed a timely opposition and a cross-motion for summary judgment seeking contractual indemnity from TMC. Having reviewed the memoranda in support, the oppositions, and the applicable law, the court now rules.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases