1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 3 Cal.App.4th
  5. 3 Cal.App.4th 164 (1992)
 

BLUE JEANS EQUITIES v. CITY & CTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A051759.

3 Cal.App.4th 164 (1992)

4 Cal. Rptr.2d 114

BLUE JEANS EQUITIES WEST, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

January 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ellman, Burke, Hoffman & Johnson and Howard N. Ellman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ronald A. Zumbrun, Edward J. Connor, Jr., and Richard M. Stephens as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, Robin M. Reitzes, Deputy City Attorney, and George E. Krueger for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WHITE, P.J.

In this action we consider whether the heightened scrutiny test alluded to in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n (1987) 483 U.S. 825 [97 L.Ed.2d 677, 107 S.Ct. 3141] (hereafter Nollan) should be applied to San Francisco's Transit Impact Development Fee (TIDF) Ordinance. (Ord. No. 224-81, codified at S.F. Admin. Code, § 38.1 et seq.) We conclude the Nollan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases