KATT v. DYKHOUSE

No. 92-1187.

983 F.2d 690 (1992)

Peter C. KATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David DYKHOUSE, Michigan Commissioner of Insurance and Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 23, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R.Q. Wolfson (argued and briefed), Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harry G. Iwasko, Jr., E. John Blanchard, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued and briefed), Lansing, MI, for defendants-appellees.

Before: GUY and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.


RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, a financial planner, filed this First Amendment action after the Michigan Insurance Commissioner declared that Michigan law bars the plaintiff from providing his clients with certain information concerning the availability of life insurance commission rebates in Florida. The district court held that the First Amendment claim is barred by res judicata because the plaintiff could have advanced it during an earlier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases