1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 976 F.2d
  5. 976 F.2d 691 (1992)
 

AAMODT v. U.S.

Nos. 91-5101, 91-5102.

976 F.2d 691 (1992)

James J. AAMODT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. Ruben S. ABUNDIS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory K. McGillivary, Mulholland & Hickey, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Thomas A. Woodley.

Shalom Brilliant, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Jeanne E. Davidson, Asst. Director.

Before RICH, NEWMAN, and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

These appeals present common issues of law, and are combined for decision. In accordance with Muniz v. United States, 972 F.2d 1304 (Fed.Cir.1992), we affirm the holdings of the United States Claims Court,1 dismissing the complaints in both actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review de novo the correctness of the Claims Court's dismissal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases