MUTUELLES UNIES v. KROLL & LINSTROM

Nos. 90-55009, 90-55022.

957 F.2d 707 (1992)

MUTUELLES UNIES, a French corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. KROLL & LINSTROM, a California Law Partnership, Defendant, and Sol Kroll, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 25, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manuel R. Ramos, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Diego, Cal., for defendants-appellants-cross appellees Sol Kroll, et al.

Hillel Chodos, Gina M. Putkoski-Chodos, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee-cross appellant, Mutuelles Unies.

Before FARRIS, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

In a legal malpractice action, Sol Kroll, individually, and his law firm, Kroll, Pomerantz & Cameron appeal a jury verdict awarding damages to Mutuelles Unies. The appeal questions: 1) the grant of diversity jurisdiction; 2) several jury instructions; 3) the application of California law to the settlement recommendation; 4) the application of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a); 5) the admission of plaintiff's expert declaration; and 6...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases