1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 79 Ohio
  5. 79 Ohio App.3d 86 (1992)
 

CINCINNATI EX REL. KUNTZ v. CINCINNATI

Nos. C-910242, C-910263.

79 Ohio App.3d 86 (1992)

CITY OF CINCINNATI ex rel. KUNTZ et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided April 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manley, Burke & Fischer, Andrew S. Lipton and Anne T. Perry, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Fay Danner DuPuis, City Solicitor, and James F. McCarthy III, for appellees/cross-appellants.

HILDEBRANDT, Judge.

On October 27, 1988, David Kuntz filed a complaint in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas against the within defendants (collectively the "city") in which he sought a declaratory judgment that he was entitled to participate in the city's retirement system, and that he was entitled to sick pay and vacation credit for the period of June 30, 1968 to June 2, 1973; an injunction prohibiting the city from misapplying funds and abusing its powers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases