McKINNEY v. CITY OF EL DORADO

No. 91-256.

824 S.W.2d 826 (1992)

308 Ark. 284

Isaac McKINNEY, David S. Wilkins, D.A. Ellison, Jerry D. Drummond, Torrance L. Thompson, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. CITY OF EL DORADO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Supplemental Opinion on Denial of Rehearing March 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Sherman, Little Rock, Timothy Fox, No. Little Rock, for appellants.

Henry Kinslow, El Dorado, for appellee.


GLAZE, Justice.

Appellants filed this action as an illegal exaction suit against appellee. Appellants assert that they, and the class they represent, have been illegally assessed fees and costs by appellee's municipal court and should be entitled (1) to retaxation of costs under Ark.Code Ann. § 16-68-409 (1987), (2) to damages for the violation of their due process rights and (3) for an injunction to prevent further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases