1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 973 F.2d
  5. 973 F.2d 664 (1992)
 

E.E.O.C. v. DELIGHT WHOLESALE CO.

Nos. 91-3661, 91-3786.

973 F.2d 664 (1992)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellee, v. DELIGHT WHOLESALE COMPANY, Appellant. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. DELIGHT WHOLESALE COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roland B. Miller, III, Kansas City, Mo., argued (Jack D. Rowe, on the brief), for appellant.

Lamont N. White, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellee.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Delight Wholesale appeals from the final judgment of the district court,1 which held Delight liable for violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and awarded back pay to the victim of the unlawful sex discrimination, Carol Childers. EEOC cross-appeals, challenging a deduction from the back pay award and the district court's refusal to award prejudgment interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases