OPINION AND ORDER
Mark T. Watson was charged in two separate proceedings by the Inquiry Tribunal. In the first action, the respondent was accused of violating then DR 1-102(A)(3),(4),(5) and (6); DR 9-102(B)(1) and (4); and SCR 3.130(1). The Board of Governors found as fact that in 1987 the respondent was engaged by the complainant to represent her in a personal injury case. Without her knowledge or consent, respondent not only settled the suit, but following this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.